Home / News / Urgent Appeals / INDONESIA: Police officers torture a man to death and falsify his autopsy report

INDONESIA: Police officers torture a man to death and falsify his autopsy report

September 3, 2009

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-111-2009



3 September 2009
------------------------------------------------------
INDONESIA: Police officers torture a man to death and falsify his autopsy report

ISSUES: Torture; illegal arrest; extrajudicial killing
------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has learned that police from Slawi station in Central Java tortured a man to death shortly after his arrest and torture by Tegal station police. The victim was reportedly forced to confess to a crime that he did not commit, with the post mortem report fabricated by officials to clear the killers of blame.

CASE DETAILS: (Based on interviews with relatives of the victim)

According to information from KontraS, the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence, on April 14, a Mr. Carmadi was planting rice with his parents in Pakulaut village when they were approached by two plain clothed police officers. One was later identified as Aiptu Sutrisno (NRP or Nomor Registrasi Pegawai: 65120613). The police brought Mr. Carmadi to the Tegal Police Station and placed him in custody, but without a legally required summons letter. They told the man to give a statement regarding an attack that took place four days earlier in his village on someone belonging to the campaign team of the Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan (PDI–P) legislative candidate.

The police took Mr. Carmadi to Slawi Hospital to meet with the attack victim Mr. Imron, and Mr. Imron’s brother; Mr. Imron reportedly told the officers that he knew Mr. Carmadi. His brother allegedly said that Mr. Carmadi was not the attacker. Yet on the same afternoon the detainee's brother Mr. Subur and cousin Mr. Haryono visited him and saw that his head was bleeding, and that he was injured across his upper body. The injured man told them that officers had severely beaten him and that his tongue was torn, the left side of his body hurt badly and he couldn't hear out of his left ear. He also told them that that he had confessed to having attacked Mr. Imron under duress, although he had not. Mr. Subur demanded that the police should arrange medical treatment but nothing was done so the two men stayed at the police station for most of the following day.

At 4pm the police, with no other leads, presented Mr. Carmadi's parents with an official order for his detention. He was moved to the police station at Slawi. On April 16 during a family visit the victim told them that he had been vomiting ever since the torture, and reportedly identified one of the police officers who had tortured him.

At 10pm of the same day the local village head contacted Mr. Carmadi’s father, Mr. Kusnadi, to let him know that he had been summoned to the station by police, and he had been told by a head detective with the name Rudi, on arrival that Mr. Carmadi had fainted and fallen during an interrogation. He was taken to Slawi hospital where he died. On 17 April an autopsy was performed at the hospital and his body was taken home for burial.

The family turned to the Division of Profession and Security, the internal disciplinary unit, which advised them to lodge a complaint with the head of the Criminal Investigation Division, and on May 4 Mr. Kusnadi and Mr. Haryono paid a visit to the Internal Affairs Department. At this point the detective was claiming that the autopsy showed death by suicide. However, after requesting the report, the family could see that the autopsy results and the police story did not match up with the wounds on Mr. Carmadi’s body, or the earlier claim that he had fainted under interrogation. The family also registered a report at the National Police Commission, the National Commission for Human Rights and the District Police in Tegal Central Java, but so far no legislative progress has been made.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Along with the unlawful force used during interrogation, this case points to a grave series of procedural and legal errors involving officials, political party members and staff at various police stations. Though Mr. Carmadi may have been under suspicion, he was given no chance to defend himself and no semblance of a fair trial, those speaking in his defence were ignored, and he was tortured severely by officers and then given no access to medical treatment. He was finally beaten so severely that he died. There is no accountability, no responsibility and no demonstration here that police involved understand due process. Though the evidence points to his murder, no investigation has been done into the circumstances of his torture and death, and into claims, made by his family and friends, that the autopsy report was fabricated.

This case is yet another example of what happens when a system of interrogation is neither transparent nor monitored by an institution with the power to ensure that due process is respected. It also shows the degenerative effects of this – the way that impunity can spread throughout law enforcers in a region. Throughout this process no officer has come forward with a credible account of Mr. Carmadi's death.

Human rights violations by the police are deeply institutionalized in Indonesia and sparely addressed. This is despite the Indonesian Government’s ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), which has begun to appear increasingly meaningless. Indonesia has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which means that it is legally bound by international law to protect the rights of its citizens to life, liberty and a fair trial (Article 9, Article 14) – and to vigorously address violations of these rights. The act of torture is still not punishable as a crime in Indonesian legislation. The Criminal Code (Penal Code) of Indonesia has to be reviewed in accordance with the Convention (CAT).

Indonesian citizens have a legal right to protection from disproportionate police action under interrogation, and the right to file a lawsuit concerning the lawfulness of his/her detention and physical action that could be deemed as disproportionate.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write to the Indonesian authorities listed below to demand an immediate investigation into actions taken by police of the Tegal and Slawi police stations of Central Java, and to challenge the lack of political will behind the ratification of CAT in Indonesia.

The AHRC has written a separate letter to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Question of Torture calling for an intervention in this case.

To suppor this appeal please click here:

------------------------------------------------------

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear __________,

Re: INDONESIA: Police officers torture a man to death and falsify his autopsy report

Name of victim:
Mr. Carmadi
Name of alleged perpetrators:
1. Aiptu Sutrisno [NRP (Nomor Registrasi Pegawai) 65120613
2. Officers of the Tegal Police station in Central Java
3. Officers of the Slawi Police Station in Central Java
4. Medico-legal officials responsible for conducting autopsy of Mr. Carmadi's dead body

Date of incident: 14 April 2009
Place of incident: Tegal Police Station

I am writing to voice my deep concern regarding the torture and subsequent death of Mr. Carmadi in custody at the Tegal and later the Slawi police stations in Central Java. Mr. Carmadi was arrested on 14 April 2009 and the apprehension was illegal since it was not authorised by any legal documents. Extensive torture was reported by the victim to family members and was evident in the injuries they saw on his body while he was in custody. The victim reported that he was forced to confess to an attack on a political party member, though he was not involved.

The claim by a head detective (Mr. Rudi) that the victim fainted and fell to his death during interrogation on 16 April sounds implausible, yet has not been legally challenged or properly investigated. Nor have reports by the medico-legal officials who were involved in the process of the post-mortem, who claim that the injuries on the body suggest suicide. The injuries noted in the post mortem are not the same as those on the body, according to witnesses. Please see our case details online for further information.

Along with the unlawful force used during interrogation, this case points to a grave series of procedural and legal errors involving officials, political party members and staff at various police stations. Though Mr. Carmadi may have been under suspicion he was given no chance to defend himself and no semblance of a fair trial; those speaking in his defence were ignored and he was tortured severely by officers and then given no access to medical treatment. He was then tortured to the extent that he died. There is no accountability, no responsibility and no demonstration here that police in this case employ or understand due process.

This case is yet another example of what happens when an interrogation system is neither transparent nor monitored by an institution with the power to ensure that due process is respected. It also shows the degenerative effects of this, and the way that impunity can spread throughout law enforcers in a region. Human rights violations by the police are deeply institutionalized in Indonesia and sparely addressed. This is despite the Indonesian Government’s ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT), which has begun to appear increasingly meaningless.

It should be noted that Indonesian citizens have right to protection from disproportionate police action under interrogation, and the right to file a lawsuit concerning the lawfulness of his/her detention and physical action that could be deemed as disproportionate.

I call for an immediate investigation to be conducted against police at the Tegal and Slawi police stations of Central Java, including Officer Aiptu Sutrisno (NRP 65120613). Due disciplinary and legal action must be taken and the victim’s family must be given proper redress and compensation. These actions are important to secure the impartiality, transparency and accountability of police in this region. In this respect, National Human Rights Commission and National Police Commission must play a part in ensuring that the victims receive proper redress.

I look forward to your action regarding this case.

Yours sincerely,


----------------

PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. Inspector Gen Police FX Sunarno
Chief of Police of Central Java
Jl. Pahlawan No. 1 Semarang
INDONESIA
Tel: +62 24 311 382/ 449 674

2. AKBP Drs. Iwan A. Ibrahim
Chief of Police of Tegal
Jalan Pemuda No. 2
Tegal 5211
INDONESIA
Tel: +62 283 356115
E-mail : admin@polrestategal.web.id

3. Mr. Ifdhal Kasim
Chief of Indonesian Commission on Human Rights (KOMNAS HAM)
Jln. Latuharhary No. 4B, Menteng,
Jakarta Pusat 10310
INDONESIA
Tel: +62 21 3925230 ext. 225/221
Fax: +62 21 3925227
Email: info@komnasham.go.id

4. Mr. Hendarman Supandji
Attorney General
Kejaksaan Agung RI
Jl. Sultan Hasanuddin No. 1
Jakarta Selatan
INDONESIA
Tel: + 62 21 7221337, 7397602
Fax: + 62 21 7250213

5. Mr. Samsudin S.H.
Chief of Kejaksaan Negeri Tegal
Jl.Kol Sugiono No.134 Tegal
INDONESIA

6. Mr. Andi Matalatta
Minister of Justice and Human Rights
JI. H.R. Rosuna Said Kav. 6-7
Kuningan, Jakarta Selatan
INDONESIA
Fax: +62 21 525 3095

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
AHRC-UAC-111-2009
Countries :
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.