CAMBODIA: Cambodia needs to take effective action to eliminate torture and improve policing
As the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture is
commemorated globally, the people of Cambodia continue to face serious
problems relating to guaranteed rights against torture. As far as
legislation is concerned, Cambodia has been a party to all UN
conventions relating to civil rights and rights against torture.
Recently, it also ratified the optional protocol relating to prevention
of torture, cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment and punishment. However,
the common saying in Cambodia is that while all these documents are
being signed, these have little practical value for the people.
Cambodia’s judicial and rule of law system are wholly inadequate to deal
with this problem. In the recent visit of the UN Special Rapporteur on
the situation of human rights in Cambodia, Professor Surya Prasad
Subedi, highlighted the inadequacies of the judicial system in Cambodia.
Unfortunately, the only response to this from the country’s prime
minister was "don't tell me it is raining when I am standing in the
rain." His comments were interpreted by the media to mean, 'don’t state
the obvious.' Clearly, the government shares the view that the country’s
rule of law and judicial system are inadequate. However, there are no
plans of any sort for the improvement of these systems.
As far as torture is concerned, Cambodia still does not have a proper
definition of torture incorporated into its domestic legislation. The
penal code recognizes torture as a crime, but it has not incorporated a
clear definition of torture into its legal framework. It has been the
recommendation of the CAT committee, as well as local and international
human rights organizations, that the government should bring about
legislation which incorporates a clear definition of torture. Without
clear definitions, it is not possible for courts to properly implement
the constitutional and penal code provisions relating to torture in
Cambodia.
The problem of torture in Cambodia is similar to those in neighboring
countries, and is rooted in Cambodia’s policing system which is
seriously lacking in every way. Criminal investigations still use old
methods and there has been no attempt to modernize the policing system
of Cambodia. There have been no investments in the improvement of this
system. The training of the police as well as the facilities available
to the police are entirely inadequate for dealing with criminal
investigations in a rational manner. The under-development of the
policing system results in the constant use of coercion on people who
are arrested by the police.
A characteristic of well-developed policing systems is to have a
comprehensive system for receiving complaints against the police and
dealing with such complaints in a satisfactory manner. In Cambodia, such
a system of public complaints does not exist; it has not developed any
internal controls to deal with complaints made against the policing
institution. As such, the people have no avenues to make complaints.
The only limited avenue available involves making such complaints to the
courts. However, when the alleged victims of torture make complaints,
courts inquire from the victims as to whether they want to make a
complaint against the police. At this stage, according to lawyers, the
general reply of victims is that they do not wish to make any formal
complaint. This is due to the fear of serious reprisals following the
complaints. The complete absence of any kind of protection for those
making complaints prevents people from making such complaints. Bitter
experiences of the cruel systems that Cambodia has faced in its recent
past act as a psychological and emotional barrier for making complaints.
While Cambodia is committed to breaking away from its past, and the
constitution itself recognizes this commitment, no measures have been
taken to ensure protection for torture victims so that they can make
complaints without fear of reprisals.
The deficient facilities of police stations and prisons mean that
properly securing detainees is difficult, which further engenders
torture. In police stations, there are no proper lockups, and as a
result, people are often shackled to chairs by their legs or arms.
Sometimes detainees are shackled for several months; a practice that is
commonly discussed in Cambodia. This practice has evolved in order to
prevent people from escaping. It is also common knowledge that people
who make attempts to escape are punished severely. The development of
adequate safeguards for arrested people is a primary need for the
protection of victims and prevention of torture at police stations and
detention centers.
Forensic pathology has not yet been introduced to Cambodia. Victims of
torture are not been examined by doctors. The result is that no medical
reports are made out on torture victims. The government of Cambodia and
United nations agencies operating in Cambodia should collaborate in
introducing medical and forensic facilities. Foreign donors should
promote education of forensic pathologists. This will be a great
contribution to prevention of torture as well as improvement of criminal
investigations.
The Cambodian government has not acknowledged its duty for the
compensation of victims of human rights abuses, including victims of
torture. There is no possibility for victims to bring about suits so as
to receive compensation for torture or cruel, inhuman treatment.
Providing legal redress for torture remains a requirement that needs to
be developed.
There are no facilities for psychological assistance, such as trauma
counseling for torture victims. Some human rights organizations are
attempting to provide such help by their own initiatives. However, due
to inadequate support from the state and funding agencies, a system of
providing psychological rehabilitation for victims has not been
developed as yet.
Other inadequacies for the legal system for proper investigations into
abuses, such as sexual harassment of women and children, are also
serious flaws in the Cambodian legal system. In the absence of proper
complaint and investigation mechanisms, many crimes are committed in
this area and they go unaddressed. Thus, from the point of view of
guaranteeing the rights of women and children, the government’s
compliance with the convention against torture, cruel and inhuman
treatment remains a necessity.
