Home / News / Urgent Appeals / UPDATE (Thailand): Torture cases transferred to special investigators, but police still free

UPDATE (Thailand): Torture cases transferred to special investigators, but police still free

December 7, 2004

UPDATE ON URGENT APPEAL UPDATE ON URGENT APPEAL UPDATE ON URGENT APPEAL

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Update on Urgent Appeal
2 December 2004

[RE: UA-153-2004: THAILAND: Two cases of extremely serious torture and cruel and inhuman treatment by Thai police officers; UP-71-2004: THAILAND: More serious allegations of police torture emerge in Thailand; UP-75-2004: THAILAND: Demand immediate criminal action against police torturers]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
UP-78-2004: THAILAND: Torture cases transferred to special investigators, but police still free

THAILAND: Torture; cruel and inhuman treatment; forced confession; impunity; illegal detention; denial of due process rights
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is pleased to announce that the two cases of torture and cruel and inhuman treatment recently reported as having occurred in Lumpini (Bangkok) and Ayutthaya police stations (UA-153-2004) have been transferred to the Department of Special Investigation (DSI). The DSI is headed by a police officer, but is under the authority of the ministry of justice, and is therefore less subject to police influence in undertaking its investigations. However, to date to our knowledge no formal charges have been brought against the alleged torturers.

According to the information received, on November 29 the Minister of Justice, Mr Pongthep Thepkanjana, chaired a meeting of the special cases committee. During the meeting he instructed the police to transfer the case of cruel and inhuman treatment of Mr Chol Narapinit and Mr Siri-on Changluadlai at Lumpini Police Station and Mr Ekkawat Srimanta at Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Police Station to the DSI. He explained that although the National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC) had been given the cases, it would make the public more comfortable if they were in the hands of the DSI. He said that after the cases were transferred, special teams would be formed to conduct inquiries together with the public prosecutor. This is a new measure recently proposed for some cases to take total control for investigations out of the hands of the police.

During the meeting, the committee also discussed the case of Mr Charoen Wat-aksorn (UA-76-2004 and UP-40-2004), a prominent environmentalist shot as he stepped off a bus in June, in which summons are still to be issued. However, no discussion was made into the case of the missing human rights lawyer Mr Somchai Neelaphaijit (FA-06-2004). This is despite earlier assertions by the minister that progress is being made into the inquiry (UP-61-2004).


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

The remarks by the minister in the meeting indicate that public pressure against police torturers in Thailand is having an effect. Without this, these cases would have remained in the hands of the police, who would have sought to absolve their colleagues of wrongdoing.

The two cases from Lumpini and Ayutthaya stations are particularly important because they are early test cases for the new witness protection and investigation programmes in Thailand. If the cases against the police are not successful, and if the accused persons are still subjected to threats and other abuses, it will damage public confidence in these new measures very much. As confidence in the police is already at an all-time low in Thailand, it is important that the ministry of justice play a very active role in dealing with criminal police officers.

At the same time as this is happening, the prime minister of Thailand proposed introducing a national security law that would give the police greatly expanded powers (AS-57-2004). With extended powers of detention, torture and other gross abuses of human rights would increase dramatically in police stations of Thailand. However, after strong public outcry, the government backed down from the suggestion, saying that the five existing laws for dealing with national security are sufficient.


SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write to the minister expressing appreciation for the transfer of these cases to the DSI but expressing concern that the accused police be arrested and charged as quickly as possible, particularly in light of the ample evidence in both cases. Please also stress that the chiefs and their deputies in the police stations concerned is held responsible for the actions of their subordinates. Finally, please urge the government of Thailand to ratify the Convention against Torture and introduce it into domestic law without delay,

Sample letter:

Dear Mr Pongthep

RE: Investigations into recent cases of torture and cruel and inhuman treatment and punishment and proposal for the introduction of a national security law into Thailand

I am pleased to hear that you instructed on November 29 that the Royal Thai Police transfer investigation of the case of cruel and inhuman treatment of Mr Chol Narapinit and Mr Siri-on Changluadlai at Lumpini Police Station and Mr Ekkawat Srimanta at Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Police Station to the Department of Special Investigation. I am also pleased to hear that the subsequent inquiries will be conducted jointly with the Office of the Attorney General.

I trust that the investigations will be completed speedily and charges will be laid against the perpetrators without unnecessary delay. I am also concerned that action be taken against the superintendents and deputy superintendents of the stations concerned, without whose knowledge these gross abuses of human rights could not have occurred.

However, I am disappointed to have not heard anything further of the progress of investigations into the case of missing human rights lawyer MR Somchai Neelaphaijit, despite earlier assertions from you that action was being taken into his case. I trust that his case will also be at the top of the agenda in further discussions undertaken by the special cases committee.

Finally, I urge Thailand to ratify the UN Convention against Torture and introduce it into the domestic law at the nearest possible date, particularly in view of the fact that the Constitution of Thailand itself prohibits torture.

Yours sincerely,


--------------------------------------


PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTER TO:

Mr Pongthep Thepkanjana
Minister of Justice
Office of the Ministry of Justice
Ministry of Justice Building
22nd Floor
Chaeng Wattana Road
Pakkred, Nonthaburi
Bangkok 11120
THAILAND
Tel: +66 2 502 6776/ 8223
Fax: +662 502 6699/ 6734/ 6884

PLEASE SEND COPIES TO:

1. Dr Thaksin Shinawatra
Prime Minister
Government House
Pissanulok Road, Dusit District
Bangkok 10300
THAILAND
Tel: +662 280 1404/ 3000
Fax: +662 282 8631/ 280 1589/ 629 8213
Email: thaksin@thaigov.go.th, govspkman@mozart.inet.co.th

2. Dr Bhokin Bhalakula
Minister of Interior
Office of the Ministry of Interior
Thanon Atsadang
Bangkok 10200
THAILAND
Tel: +662 224-6320/ 6341
Fax: +662 226-4371/ 222 8866
Email: webteam@moi.go.th

3. Pol. Gen. Kowit Wattana
Commissioner-General
Royal Thai Police
1st Bldg, 7th Floor
Rama I , Patumwan,
Bangkok 10330
THAILAND
Tel. +662 205-1313/ 205-220/ 205-1840-9
Fax: +662 251-5956/ 205 3738/ 255 1975-8

4. Professor Saneh Chamarik
Chairperson
National Human Rights Commission of Thailand
422 Phya Thai Road
Pathurn Wan District
Bangkok 10300
THAILAND
Fax: +66 2 219 2940
Email: commission@nhrc.or.th

5. Professor Manfred Nowak
Special Rapporteur on the Question of Torture
Attn: Mr. Safir Sayed
C/o OHCHR-UNOG
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Tel: +41 22 917 9230
Fax: +41 22 917 9006/ 9016/ 9018
E-mail: ssyed@ohchr.org


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)

Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Update
Document ID :
UP-78-2004
Countries :
Issues :
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.