Home / News / Urgent Appeals / SRI LANKA: A young man brutally tortured by the Veyangoda police after his illegal arrest

SRI LANKA: A young man brutally tortured by the Veyangoda police after his illegal arrest

October 7, 2004

URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM

8 October 2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------
UA-133-2004: SRI LANKA: A young man brutally tortured by the Veyangoda police after his illegal arrest

SRI LANKA: Illegal arrest and detention; Torture
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is gravely concerned by a case regarding the severe torture of Mr. Horathelpedige Vijitha Dammika Nimalasiri (25) by the Veyangoda police on 5 September 2004. The victim was illegally arrested by the Veyangoda police in the early morning and brutally tortured by five police officers including the Sub inspector, Wijewardene.

The AHRC also notice with grave concern that the Veyangoda police committed several irregularities during the process of arrest. The victim was not informed of the reason for his arrest, nor shown the warrant of arrest. In particular, the police allegedly attempted to hide their identification by giving wrong information to the victim's family stating that they were from the Gampaha police station.

Please write a letter to the government of Sri Lanka demanding a proper inquiry into this matter, and prosecute the responsible officers. Please also request the government of Sri Lanka to take genuine action to stop torture in police stations without delay.

Urgent Appeals Desk
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
------------------------------------------------------

DETAILED INFORMATION:

Name of the victim: Mr. Horathelpedige Vijitha Dammika Nimalasiri, 25 years old, a three-wheeler driver, married with no children
Address of the victim: No. 29, Korasawatte Udugampola, in Gampaha District in the Western Province
Alleged perpetrators: 1) Sub inspector, Wijewardene of the Veyangoda Police Station, 2) The police officer who drove the vehicle at the time of the arrest of the victim, 3) 3 other police officers attached to the Veyangoda Police Station (All of them can be identified by the victim.)
Date of arbitrary arrest and torture: 5 September 2004

Account of the incident:

Mr. Horathelpedige Vijitha Dammika Nimalasiri (the name mentioned as Dhammika hereafter) is a three-wheeler driver, which is rented from its owner.

At about 2:00am on 5 September 2004, Dhammika and his father woke up when someone shouted outside and knocked on the house door. When Dhammika's father opened the door, he saw five persons standing outside. The father noticed that they were police officers because one person was wearing a police uniform, though the others were in civilian clothes. They told the father that they were from the Gampaha Police Station and asked whether there was a three-wheeler driver in the house. When the father replied that his son was, the police entered Dhammika's room and requested he go with them to the police station. Dhammika asked the reason for his arrest, but they simply told him that he would be informed at the police station. The five officers did not produce any arrest warrant or their identity cards at the time of the arrest.

The police then took Dhammika to a police vehicle, which was parked some distance from the house, instead in front of the house. When they approached the vehicle, the policemen began to assault Dhammika with their hands. They beat him at random on his chest, stomach and backside. In the vehicle, the police continuously assaulted Dhammika with rifle butts and trampled him. Dhammika still did not know why he was being beaten and or taken to the police station.

When the vehicle stopped at Naiwela junction for a while, the officer in the front seat ordered the other officers in the back seat to attack Dhammika again. While he was brutally beaten, the police asked, "Did you carry any stolen goods in your three-wheeler?" Surprised, Dhammika denied the allegation and said that he did know anything about it, but the police told him that they brought his three-wheeler to the police station.

When they arrived at the police station, Dhammika realized that he had been brought to the Veyangoda Police Station instead of the Gampaha Police Station, despite the policemen stating that they were at his house. The police parked the vehicle at the rear of the building and took Dhammika to a dark room. In the room, there were four police officers. They ordered Dhammika to take off all his clothes. They then ordered him to lie on a wooden box, face downwards and raise his legs. All the four officers then began to hit Dhammika's soles with poles for about 15 minutes. After that, Dhammika was turned over, his face now facing upwards, at which point the police began to hit his soles, knees and sexual organs. He then was turned face down, and forced to inhale from a polythene bag containing petrol which was tied to his neck. He could not tolerate the pain and shouted in agony. This process continued three times in total. During this time, he fell unconscious.

When he came to at about 6:00am, he saw that the polythene bag had been removed from his neck. The police forced Dhammika to dress himself. He put on his trousers while seated, as he could not stand on his feet due to the pain. Before putting on his shirt, he shook his shirt to remove the dust. When he did this, the dust went to an office nearby.  This officer became very angry and began to trample Dhammika, torturing him relentlessly.  This time the one who tortured him was the driver of the police vehicle. Here too, he became unconscious again. When he regained his consciousness, he put on the shirt with great difficulty, due to the pain he had incurred by the constant battering he had received.

The police then ordered Dhammika to stand, but he could not do it and fell down. Behind the police station, four or five officers went across a barb-wired fence, and Dhammika too was asked to follow them. As he could not do so due to the weakness he felt after so much of repeated battering, the police had no option but to carry him to a vehicle parked outside. When he was being taken, Dhammika saw that his brothers were at the entrance of the police station. He was evidently being carried away to avoid any contact with his brothers.

When he was taken in the police vehicle, the police told Dhammika to tell his home people that he was brought to the police station only now. The vehicle took a detour and entered the police station from the main gate. Sub Inspector (S.I.), Wijewardene, informed Dhammika's home people that he was brought only now, and not a single blow was given to him. He was put in the lock-up and at around 10:00am and the police released him after recording a statement. After being released, Dhammika informed his family that he was tortured from the moment he had been arrested.

According to Dhammika, the persons responsible for the torture are S.I. Wijewardene, and four other police officers, including the driver of the vehicle.  Dhammika was hospitalized at the Gampaha Hospital on September 10. The incident was reported in news papers and Dhammika's father has sent letters to the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, and the Chief Justice with copies to the President.  

SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please send a letter, fax or an email to the addresses below and express your concern about this serious case.

Sample letter:

---------------

Dear __________,

Re: SRI LANKA: A young man brutally tortured by the Veyangoda police after his illegal arrest

Name of the victim:
Mr. Horathelpedige Vijitha Dammika Nimalasiri, 25 years old, a three-wheeler driver, married with no children
Address of the victim: No. 29, Korasawatte Udugampola, in Gampaha District in the Western Province
Alleged perpetrators: 1) Sub inspector, Wijewardene of the Veyangoda Police Station, 2) The police officer who drove the vehicle at the time of the arrest of the victim, 3) 3 other police officers attached to the Veyangoda Police Station (All of them can be identified by the victim.)
Date of arbitrary arrest and torture: 5 September 2004

I am writing to protest against the brutal torture of the young man named above. This case is yet another addition to the cruel practice of illegal arrest and torture that is being allowed to go on in police stations in Sri Lanka.

I also would like to draw your attention on the complete irregularities committed by the Veyangoda police regarding the procedure carried out whilst arresting the victim. At the time of the arrest, the Veyangoda police did not wear their uniforms (with exception to one officer), inform the victim of the reason for his arrest, nor show a warrant of arrest. The police also attempted to hide their identification by giving wrong information to the victim's family stating that they were from the Gampaha police station. Moreover, the police used unnecessary violence, in the form of torture, at the time of arrest and thereafter.    

I strongly urge you to investigate this case and arrest and prosecute the responsible officers under the Torture (CAT) Act of Sri Lanka (Act No. 22 of 1994). I also request you to ensure that the victim receive medical assistance for his injuries caused by the torture. I further call for you to discipline the police so that they desist from illegal arrest, and from torture. For this purpose, I suggest the government of Sri Lanka to instruct the police to fully observe the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, No. 15 of 1979 that strictly specifies the procedure of arrest by the police. The government of Sri Lanka must take genuine steps to stop torture without delay.

Yours faithfully,


--------------------
 

Send a letter to:

1. Mr. Mahindra Rajapakse
Prime Minister
Cambridge Place
Colombo 7
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 682905 / 575454
E-mail: secpm@sltnet.lk or bradmanw@slt.lk

2. Mr. K. C. Kamalasabesan
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436 421
Email: attorney@sri.lanka.net or counsel@sri.lanka.net

3. Mr. Chandra Fernando
Inspector General of Police (IGP)
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440/426711/327877

4. Mr. Ranjith Abeysuriya PC
Chairperson
National Police Commission
69-1 Ward Place, Colombo 7
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 669 528
Fax HOME: +94 11 2 674148
E-mail: polcom@sltnet.lk

5. Dr. Radhika Coomaraswamy
Chairperson
Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka
No. 36, Kynsey Road
Colombo 8
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk

6. Mr. Theo C. van Boven
Special Rapporteur on the Question of Torture
OHCHR-UNOG
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Fax: +41 22 917 9016


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
UA-133-2004
Countries :
Issues :
Document Actions
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.