Home / News / Urgent Appeals / SRI LANKA: 13 year old school child is beaten by a teacher in full view of the class - once again the educational authorities take no action

SRI LANKA: 13 year old school child is beaten by a teacher in full view of the class - once again the educational authorities take no action

September 24, 2011

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION-URGENT APPEAL PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-178-2011

 

24 September 2011
------------------------------------------------------
SRI LANKA: 13 year old school child is beaten by a teacher in full view of the class - once again the educational authorities take no action

ISSUES: Torture; fair trial; right to education; impunity; rule of law
------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information that a 13 year-old school child was beaten by his class teacher in full view of the other students of his class. The parents of the child and others demonstrated in front of the school and the educational authorities promised to take action. However, to date no such action has taken place. The perpetrator is still working at the same school under the Ministry of Education. This case is one of many where teachers enjoy impunity for their brutal treatment of the children in their care.

CASE NARRATIVE:

According to the information that the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) received Mr. Vimalasena Tuduwara and Ms. Wickramasinghe Vithanage Gunasilee are the father and the mother of Janith Chathuranga Tuduwara (13) of Malpudanaella, Pitabaddara in the Matara District.

Janith studies at grade 8 of the Ptabaddara Navodya National School. On 14 July 2011 Janith went to school as usual. When the class teacher came to the class and asked the students as to how the table cloth on the teachers table got dirty no one offered an explanation. The class teacher then ordered the students to throw away the table cloth. Janith raised his hand and told the teacher of his wiliness to take the table cloth home and asked his parents to launder it. Janith further informed the teacher that as the table cloth was bought by the money collected by the students he thought it should be reused.



On hearing this the teacher became angry and shouted at Janith. Without warning he took a wooden pole and started to beat the child. This incident was witnessed by the all the students of the class but none of them were able to stop the teacher. As a result of the beating Janith received an injury to the head and was admitted to the Morawaka Government Hospital.

In order to oppose the assault on Janith the other parents organised a protest on 17 July 2011 in front of the school. While the protest was going on the officers of the Divisional Educational Office spoke to the protestors and pleaded with them to stop the protest. They promised the protestors that they would initiate a investigation into the incident and would take necessary actions against the perpetrator. The protestors were satisfied with this explanation and stopped their action.

However, until now neither the police nor the educational authorities have investigated the incident of the torture of a 13-year-old student. Once again justice has been denied and the educational authorities are covering up for one of their teachers despite the fact that the beating was done in front of witnesses. The promises of the educational authorities were made simply to halt a potentially embarrassing situation. However, now they have to explain, not only to the parents of the child and other children of the school, but also to the Sri Lankan public why they have failed to take action against a cruel and arrogant teacher.

The victim narrated the way how he was tortured in the YouTube video here.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

The Asian Human Rights Commission has reported innumerable cases of torturing innocent by different state authorities in Sri Lanka which are illegal under international and local law which have taken place at different state premieres including different Police Station in the country over the past few years.

Constitution of Sri Lanka has guaranteed the right freedom from torture. According to the Article 11 of the constitution "No person shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment". Article 12 (1) of the Constitution of Sri Lanka has guaranteed the right to equality for all persons as stated that 'all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to the equal protection of the law'.

Further state of Sri Lanka has not ratified the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Furthermore, Sri Lanka has signed and ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Nevertheless the lack of protection offered to those who are willing to take cases against abusive police officers and the state authorities, means that the law is under-used continues to be employed as a tool by the police to harass people. This not only takes a long-term toll on the victim and his or her family, but on society as a whole, by undermining of civilian respect for the law and encouraging impunity.

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT)
The State of Sri Lanka sign and ratified the CAT on 3 January 1994. Following state obligations Sri Lanka adopted Act number 22 of 1994 the law adopted by the Sri Lankan parliament making torture a crime that can be punishable for minimum seven years and not less than ten years on being proven guilty. The Attorney General of Sri Lanka is suppose to file indictments in the case where credible evidence were found on torturing people by state officers.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please send a letter to the authorities listed below expressing your concern about this case and requesting an immediate investigation into the allegations of torturing, by state perpetrators, and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the criminal law of the country for misusing powers of a state officers and for mis-prosecution. The officers involved must also be subjected to internal investigations for the breach of the department orders as issued by the educational department. Further, please also request the Minister of Education and the Secretary of Education of Central Government of Sri Lanka to have a special investigation into the case of torturing and abusing the state officers' powers illegally in favor of private parties.

Please note that the AHRC has also written a separate letter to the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and to the Chairperson of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on this regard.

To support this appeal, please click here:

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear ________,

SRI LANKA: 13 year school old child is beaten by a teacher in full view of the class - once again the educational authorities take no action

Name of the victim: Janith Chathuranga Tuduwara (13) of Malpudanaella, Pitabaddara in the Matara District.
Alleged perpetrator: Class teacher of the grade 8 of the Pitabaddara Navodya School
Date of incident: 14 July 2011
Place of incident: Pitabaddara Navodya School in Matara District

I am writing to express my serious concern over the case of case of the beating of Janith Chathuranga Tuduwara (13) of Malpudanaella, Pitabaddara in the Matara District.

According to the information I have received Mr. Vimalasena Tuduwara and Ms. Wickramasinghe Vithanage Gunasilee are Janith's father and mother.

Janith studies at grade 8 of the Ptabaddara Navodya National School. On 14 July 2011 Janith went to school as usual. When the class teacher came to the class and asked the students as to how the table cloth on the teachers table got dirty no one offered an explanation. The class teacher then ordered the students to throw away the table cloth. Janith raised his hand and told the teacher of his wiliness to take the table cloth home and asked his parents to launder it. Janith further informed the teacher that as the table cloth was bought by the money collected by the students he thought it should be reused.

On hearing this the teacher became angry and shouted at Janith. Without warning he took a wooden pole and started to beat the child. This incident was witnessed by the all the students of the class but none of them were able to stop the teacher. As a result of the beating Janith received an injury to the head and was admitted to the Morawaka Government Hospital.

In order to oppose the assault on Janith the other parents organised a protest on 17 July 2011 in front of the school. While the protest was going on the officers of the Divisional Educational Office spoke to the protestors and pleaded with them to stop the protest. They promised the protestors that they would initiate a investigation into the incident and would take necessary actions against the perpetrator. The protestors were satisfied with this explanation and stopped their action.

However, until now neither the police nor the educational authorities have investigated the incident of the torture of a 13-year-old student. Once again justice has been denied and the educational authorities are covering up for one of their teachers despite the fact that the beating was done in front of witnesses. The promises of the educational authorities were made simply to halt a potentially embarrassing situation. However, now they have to explain, not only to the parents of the child and other children of the school, but also to the Sri Lankan public why they have failed to take action against a cruel and arrogant teacher.

I request your urgent intervention to ensure that the authorities listed below instigate an immediate investigation into the allegations of torture, by the state perpetrators, and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the criminal law of the country for misusing powers of state officers and for wrongful prosecution. The officers involved must also be subjected to internal investigations for the breach of the department orders as issued by the police department.

Yours sincerely,

---------------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. N K Illangakoon
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877
E-mail: igp@police.lk

2. Ms. Eva Wanasundara
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk

3. Chairperson
National Child Protection Authority
330, Thalawathgoda Road
Madiwella
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 778 912/13/14
Fax: +94 11 2 778 975
E-mail: ncpa@childprotection.gov.lk

4. Mr. Bandula Gunawardana
Minister of Education
Ministry of Education
'Isurupaya', Pelawatte
Battaramulla
Colombo
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 784 832
Fax: +94 11 2 784 825
E-mail: minedu@moe.gov.lk

5. Director Provincial Education
No 76, Ananda Kumaraswamy Mawatha
Greenpath
Colombo 07
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 693 893 / 11 2 693 895
Fax: +94 11 2 693 894 (ATTN: PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION)

6. Bo Viktor Nylun
Head of Child Protection
UNICEF Sri Lanka
P.O. Box 143, Colombo
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 555 270 (6 lines)
Fax: +94 11 2 551 333
E-mail: colombo@unicef.org

7. Director
Bureau for the Prevention and Abuse of Children and Women
No: 25, Srimath Baron Jayathilake Mawatha
Colombo 01
Tel: +94 011 2392488

8. Secretary
Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission
No. 108
Barnes Place
Colombo 07
SRI LANKA
Tel: +9411 2694925, +9411 2685980, +9411 2685981
Fax: +9411 2694924 (General) +94112696470 (Chairman)
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
AHRC-UAC-178-2011
Countries :
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.