Beranda / News / Urgent Appeals / SRI LANKA: A Young man was illegally arrested and tortured by the Kakirawa Police

SRI LANKA: A Young man was illegally arrested and tortured by the Kakirawa Police

September 7, 2011

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION-URGENT APPEAL PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-155-2011

 

7 September 2011
------------------------------------------------------
SRI LANKA: A Young man was illegally arrested and tortured by the Kakirawa Police

ISSUES: Illegal arrest; arbitrary detention; torture; impunity; rule of law
------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

Mr. Aadawalage Gayan Indika (26) of No 6th Canal, Kagama in Kakirawa in the district of Anuradhapura is married and father of one son. Gayan was travelling with his brother on his motorbike when they were stopped by plain clothed persons who demanded their identities. When Gayan in turn demanded the identities of the group he was told that they were officers of the Kakiwara Police station. Gayan was accused of making illicit liquor and when he refused the accusation he was severely beaten by the officers who he believes were working hand in hand with the person actually producing the liquor. This is yet another example of the breakdown of the Sri Lankan policing system.

CASE NARRATIVE:

According to the information the Asian Human Rights Commission received Mr. Aadawalage Gayan Indika (26) of No 6th Canal, Kagama in Kakirawa in the district of Anuradhapura is married and the father of one son. He is a barber by profession.

AHRC-UAC-155-2011-01.JPGOn 7 August 2011 Gayan was on his way to drop his brother at Walpaluwa Garage in the same village on his motor bike at the 6th Canal Junction. Some people in civilian clothes signaled him to stop his motor bike. He did so and one of the group asked for his identity and that of his brother. Gayan simply questioned the identity of three people and one person answered that he was Inspector of Police (IP) Jagoda of Kakirawa Police Station. Then IP Jagoda told the brothers that they had received information that Gayan is engaged in the production of illicit liquor. Gayan was shocked at this and told the officers that he had never engaged in such activity at any time in his life. Ignoring this IP Jagoda asked the location of the place where they produced the liquor. Again Gayan refused the accusation. At that point they forced him to lie down on the ground and started beating him with sticks and branches. While all three officers joined in the assault IP Jagoda was the most violent. Following this one officer, later identified as Nimal, asked Gayan to come to the side of the road which he did. Gayan was asked to pay a bribe so that they could go on their way but he repeated that he had never engaged in such an activity and was not willing to accept such accusations.

Then officer Nimal told Gayan to get onto the motor bike of the other office named Bandara. He went on to say that he knew the place where the illicit liquor was hidden. Then they started to proceed ahead. While they travelling one officer questioned Gayan as to whether he knew a villager called Mahatun who is continuously engaged in producing and selling illicit liquor. Gayan replied that he did. When they arrived at the destination Gayan noticed that the police officers moved forward and met with Mahatun and talked to him in private. He further noticed that the officers searched some bushes and discovered some equipment. Gayan was not party to the discussion between the officers and Mahatun but noticed that the equipment was left at the same place when they set off to the police station at Kakirawa. Then Gayan saw that his wife and his brother-in-law came in search of him and met with the police officers. They talked to the officers and vehemently opposed Gayan's arrest and the accusation that he was producing and selling illicit liquor. They strongly told the officers that Gayan was innocent and had never engaged in committing any crime. Then the police officers announced that they could not release Gayan at that moment as he had been severely beaten. They openly told Gayan's wife and brother-in-law that they were going to file a fabricated charge against him.

Later he was brought to the Kakirawa Police Station. Within a short time an officer came with a glass bottle filled with pale coloured liquid, some paper and some other stationary equipment. The officer forced Gayan to put his signature on the paper which he did out of fear of further torture. After having the signature and later the finger prints also to the paper the officer arrogantly announced to Gayan, "Though you told that there was no illicit liquor in your possession, see now there is evidence of liquor in your name".

Later he was released on police bail when his wife and brother-in-law came to the police station. Later he was brought to the house but as he was in severe pain they took him to the Galnewa Government Hospital for treatment at around 10 pm on the same day. The doctors advised them to admit Gayan for treatment. While he was treated at that hospital he started vomiting so he was transferred to the Anuradhapura Teaching Hospital for further treatment on 10 August. He was treated in that hospital for a further five days and discharged on 15 August. While he was treated at hospital the Judicial Medical Officer (JMO) examined him and recorded the marks of injuries inflicted by the police torture.

Gayan is now suffering severe pain and shows signs of post traumatic stress. He is seeking justice against the violation of his fundamental rights violations and asking for the prosecution of the officers who tortured him. He also believes that the officers arrested and beat him in order to protect the actual producer of the illicit liquor.

The victim narrated the way he was tortured in the video here.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

The Asian Human Rights Commission has reported innumerable cases of torturing innocent by the Sri Lankan police which are illegal under international and local law which have taken place at different Police Station in the country over the past few years.

The State of Sri Lanka sign and ratified the CAT on 3 January 1994. Following state obligations Sri Lanka adopted Act number 22 of 1994 the law adopted by the Sri Lankan parliament making torture a crime that can be punishable for minimum seven years and not less than ten years on being proven guilty. The Attorney General of Sri Lanka is suppose to file indictments in the case where credible evidence were found on torturing people by state officers.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please send a letter to the authorities listed below expressing your concern about this case and requesting an immediate investigation into the allegations of illegal arrest, illegal detention, torturing by the police perpetrators, and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the criminal law of the country for misusing powers of a state. The officers involved must also be subjected to internal investigations for the breach of the department orders as issued by the police department. Further, please also request the NPC and the IGP to have a special investigation into the malpractices of the police officers for abusing the state officers' powers.

Please note that the AHRC has also written a separate letter to the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on this regard.

To support this appeal please click here:  

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear ________,

SRI LANKA: A Young man was illegally arrested and tortured by the Kakirawa Police

Name of the victim: Mr. Aadawalage Gayan Indika (26) of No 6th Canal, Kagama in Kakirawa in the district of Anuradhapura
Alleged perpetrators:
1. Mr. Jagoda, Inspector of Police
2. Police Officer Bandara
3. Police Officer Nimal and other police officers attached to the Police Station of Kakirawa
Date of incident: 7 August 2011
Place of incident: Kakirawa Police Station

I am writing to express my serious concern over the case of Mr. Aadawalage Gayan Indika (26) of No 6th Canal, Kagama in Kakirawa in the district of Anuradhapura. Gayan is married and the father of one son. He is a barber by profession.

On 7 August 2011 Gayan was on his way to drop his brother at Walpaluwa Garage in the same village on his motor bike at the 6th Canal Junction. Some people in civilian clothes signaled him to stop his motor bike. He did so and one of the group asked for his identity and that of his brother. Gayan simply questioned the identity of three people and one person answered that he was Inspector of Police (IP) Jagoda of Kakirawa Police Station. Then IP Jagoda told the brothers that they had received information that Gayan is engaged in the production of illicit liquor. Gayan was shocked at this and told the officers that he had never engaged in such activity at any time in his life. Ignoring this IP Jagoda asked the location of the place where they produced the liquor. Again Gayan refused the accusation. At that point they forced him to lie down on the ground and started beating him with sticks and branches. While all three officers joined in the assault IP Jagoda was the most violent. Following this one officer, later identified as Nimal, asked Gayan to come to the side of the road which he did. Gayan was asked to pay a bribe so that they could go on their way but he repeated that he had never engaged in such an activity and was not willing to accept such accusations.

Then officer Nimal told Gayan to get onto the motor bike of the other office named Bandara. He went on to say that he knew the place where the illicit liquor was hidden. Then they started to proceed ahead. While they travelling one officer questioned Gayan as to whether he knew a villager called Mahatun who is continuously engaged in producing and selling illicit liquor. Gayan replied that he did. When they arrived at the destination Gayan noticed that the police officers moved forward and met with Mahatun and talked to him in private. He further noticed that the officers searched some bushes and discovered some equipment. Gayan was not party to the discussion between the officers and Mahatun but noticed that the equipment was left at the same place when they set off to the police station at Kakirawa. Then Gayan saw that his wife and his brother-in-law came in search of him and met with the police officers. They talked to the officers and vehemently opposed Gayan's arrest and the accusation that he was producing and selling illicit liquor. They strongly told the officers that Gayan was innocent and had never engaged in committing any crime. Then the police officers announced that they could not release Gayan at that moment as he had been severely beaten. They openly told Gayan's wife and brother-in-law that they were going to file a fabricated charge against him.

Later he was brought to the Kakirawa Police Station. Within a short time an officer came with a glass bottle filled with pale coloured liquid, some paper and some other stationary equipment. The officer forced Gayan to put his signature on the paper which he did out of fear of further torture. After having the signature and later the finger prints also to the paper the officer arrogantly announced to Gayan, "Though you told that there was no illicit liquor in your possession, see now there is evidence of liquor in your name".

Later he was released on police bail when his wife and brother-in-law came to the police station. Later he was brought to the house but as he was in severe pain they took him to the Galnewa Government Hospital for treatment at around 10 pm on the same day. The doctors advised them to admit Gayan for treatment. While he was treated at that hospital he started vomiting so he was transferred to the Anuradhapura Teaching Hospital for further treatment on 10 August. He was treated in that hospital for a further five days and discharged on 15 August. While he was treated at hospital the Judicial Medical Officer (JMO) examined him and recorded the marks of injuries inflicted by the police torture.

Gayan is now suffering severe pain and shows signs of post traumatic stress. He is seeking justice against the violation of his fundamental rights violations and asking for the prosecution of the officers who tortured him. He also believes that the officers arrested and beat him in order to protect the actual producer of the illicit liquor.

I request your urgent intervention to ensure that the authorities listed below instigate an immediate investigation into the allegations of illegal arrest, illegal detention, torture by the police perpetrators, and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the criminal law of the country for misusing powers of state officers and for wrongful prosecution. The officers involved must also be subjected to internal investigations for the breach of the department orders as issued by the police department.

Yours sincerely,

---------------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. N K Illangakoon
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877
E-mail: igp@police.lk

2. Mr. Mohan Peiris
Attorney General
Attorney General's Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk

3. Secretary
National Police Commission
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers
109 Galle Road
Colombo 03
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 395310
Fax: +94 11 2 395867
E-mail: npcgen@sltnet.lk or polcom@sltnet.lk

4. Secretary
Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission
No. 108
Barnes Place
Colombo 07
SRI LANKA
Tel: +9411 2694925, +9411 2685980, +9411 2685981
Fax: +9411 2694924 (General) +94112696470 (Chairman)
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
AHRC-UAC-155-2011
Countries :
Aksi-aksi Dokumen
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.