INDIA: Police refuses to investigate a case of rape

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-073-2009
ISSUES: Child rights, Corruption, Police negligence, Police violence, Sexual violence, Violence against women, Women's rights,

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from the QIC-AC Uttar Pradesh, a human rights association based in Uttar Pradesh state, India that police refused to register a case regarding the rape of a minor. The QIC-AC reports that 13-year-old Puja (name changed) was raped by her neighbour on 26 February, but that the police refused to register a complaint or to investigate it until 2 March, when a local human rights group intervened. Even after registering the case, officers have carried out no investigation and even threatened the girl’s family to try and make them withdraw the complaint.

CASE DETAILS:

Puja is a 13 year old resident of Ghuma, a village within the jurisdiction of Vihangamganj Police Station in Sonbhadra district. While she was alone at home, her neighbour, Dileep Kumar (son of Vihangam Pal) came to Puja’s house and raped her. The incident happened at about 3pm on 26 February and Puja’s father reported the rape at Vihangamganj Police Station the next day. The police did not register the complaint or investigate it.

A local human rights group, Sonbhadra Vikas Samiti wrote to the Station House Officer at the police station requesting that they register and investigate the case, which prompted him to register a First Information Report (FIR) on 2 March as a crime, number 64/09. They also arrested the accused, but did not apprehend him for long. The police then sent the FIR to the local court, but the girl was not subjected to medical examination. Sonbhadra Vikas Samiti is part of the QIC-AC coilation.

In the registered case Dileep has not been accused of rape, but of violating Section 354 (assault or criminal force against a woman with intent to outrage her modesty) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). It is a crime punishable with just two years in prison or a fine.

The police officers then inexplicably started pressuring Puja’s father to settle the matter out of court and withdraw the complaint.

The NGO QIC-AC UP informs us that the Vihangamganj police are notorious for accepting bribes from the accused and forcing complainants to withdraw complaints. Sexual intercourse with a minor amounts to rape under the IPC in any situation; there is no legal way that this case should have not been registered as such. QIC-AC UP also claims that Dileep has been accused of raping other minors in the past, and that his family has friendly ties with officers at the station.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

To ensure the prosecution of rapists and encourage rape complaints it is important for medical professionals to get involved at the preliminary stages of every case. As a result, police who have been bribed often delay the registering of the case and deny access to an examination, reducing the chances that medical evidence can be used.

In India women are still considered second class citizens, yet their conduct remains a denominator of family honour. Due to this the rape of a woman or a girl is often kept secret, which is another reason behind the low rate of prosecution or complaints for rape. Financial settlements or others, such as marriage, are often arranged instead of legal redress, causing untold psychological harm to the victim and widespread social damage. Rapists tend to reoffend, and in these cases it is the victim’s family who tend to feel disempowered.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please send letters to the authorities named below expressing your concern in this case. The AHRC is also sending a letter to the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, calling for an intervention in this case.

To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear _________,

INDIA: Rape of 13-year-old girl must be investigated

Name of victim: Puja (name changed), aged 13 years, resident of Ghuma village under the jurisdiction of Vihangamganj Police Station, Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh state and the complainant in Crime 64/09 of Vihangamganj Police Station
Name of alleged perpetrator: Mr. Dileep Kumar, son of Vigham Pal, resident of Ghuma village, and the accused in Crime 64/09 of Vihangamganj Police Station, Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh, 
Date of incident: 26 February 2009
Place of incident: Ghuma village, Sonabhadra district, Uttar Pradesh

I am writing to express my concern about the lack of police action after a 13-year-old girl was raped in Ghuma village, Sonabhadra district, Uttar Pradesh state.

I am informed that the victim in this case was raped by her neighbour at her home while her parents and family were out in the fields, and that Vihangamganj police refused to allow her father to register a case on 27 February.

A local human rights group, Sonbhadra Vikas Samiti wrote to the Station House Officer, which prompted him to register a First Information Report (FIR) on 2 March as a crime, number 64/09. They also arrested the accused, but did not apprehend him for long. The police then sent the FIR to the local court, but the girl was not subjected to medical examination.

I am extremely confused and concerned to note that in the FIR Dileep has not been accused of rape, instead, of violating Section 354 (assault or criminal force against a woman with intent to outrage her modesty) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), which is a crime punishable with just two years in prison or a fine. According to the family, the police officers then inexplicably started pressuring them to settle the matter out of court and withdraw the complaint.

According to the NGO QIC-AC UP, the Vihangamganj police are notorious for accepting bribes from the accused and forcing complainants to withdraw complaints. Sexual intercourse with a minor amounts to rape under the IPC in any situation; there is no legal way that this case should have not been registered as such. QIC-AC UP also claims that Dileep has been accused of raping other minors in the past, and that his family has friendly ties with officers at the station.

This is a matter of considerable concern. I therefore request that you immediately order an investigation into the case, and another into the negligent action taken by the Vihangamganj police. It should be established whether a bribe has changed hands and why the police appear to be protecting the rapist, rather than the 13-year-old victim. Should they be found to have connived with the accused, they must be prosecuted for corruption and for dereliction of duty. Appropriate due process must now swiftly follow: the victim must be subjected to a medical examination and her statement recorded immediately; the charge must be amended and a case of rape registered against the accused.

Yours sincerely,

—————-
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Chief Secretary
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Shri Lal Bhadur Shastri Bhavan
Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh
INDIA
Fax: +91 52 2223 9283
Email: csup@up.nic.in

2. Director General of Police
1-Tilak Marg, Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
INDIA
Fax: + 91 522 220 6120 / 220 6174
E-mail: police@up.nic.in

3. Chief Minister
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Chief Minister’s Secretariat
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
INDIA
Fax: + 91 52 2223 0002 / 2223 9234
E-mail: csup@up.nic.in

4. Minister of Women and Child Development
Government of India
Shastri Bhavan
New Delhi
INDIA
Fax + 91 11 23074054
E-mail: min-wcd@nic.in

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia) 

Document Type : Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID : AHRC-UAC-073-2009
Countries : India,
Issues : Child rights, Corruption, Police negligence, Police violence, Sexual violence, Violence against women, Women's rights,