Home / News / Urgent Appeals / THAILAND: Abuse of workers' rights at two factories on Thai-Burma border

THAILAND: Abuse of workers' rights at two factories on Thai-Burma border

November 10, 2004

URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM

10 November 2004

----------------------------------------------------------
UA-148-2003: THAILAND: Abuse of workers' rights at two factories on Thai-Burma border


THAILAND: Labour slavery; Inhumane working conditions
---------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from our partner, Yaung Chi Oo Workers Association and Map Foundation, regarding the denial of labour rights and inhumane working conditions for Burmese migrant workers at two separate factories in Mae Sot, Thailand.  At the Kong Lian Thai Knitting Co. Ltd. (1000 workers) and the Por Thai Sun (2) Co. Ltd. (65 workers), employees have been forced to work enormous hours, have had their salaries reduced to well below the minimum wage, have been denied access to labour protection representation, have in some circumstances been dismissed from work without due reasons or notice, and have been forced to leave their accommodation. 

Such treatment is in gross violation of Thailand's labour laws and is yet another example of the denial of rights to Burmese migrant workers in this region, who are routinely underpaid, exploited and abused, without any consequences to the employers. Your urgent action is required to pressure local authorities to correct this matter immediately.

Urgent Appeals Desk
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

The situation at Kong Lian Thai Knitting Co. Ltd.

Approximately 1,000 Burmese workers (Male: 300; Female: 700) at the Kong Lian Thai factory have been denied their basic rights and been exploited by their employer, a Thai-Chinese owned company.  They have been forced to work for a period of 48 hours for the paltry salary of 115 Thai baht (less than US$3), which is well below the minimum wage.  The workers have also been forced to work enormous hours, and must pay the amount of 300 baht per month for their work permits.

When the workers approached the line leader to complain about their working hours and pitiful pay, the leader took their complaint to the manager.  The manager, however, repudiated their demands for salary increases and contacted the police when the workers refused to return to work.  Soon after, the police arrived at the factory and asked workers many questions.  From that day since, workers have been denied the rice allowance they had previously been provided.

Following the dispute, the manager stated that workers would receive a salary increase.  The workers, however, feared that the owner would pay them this increase, but then dismiss them soon after.  The workers therefore sought legal protection by way of asking labour protection officers to intervene on their behalf.  When they approached the local labour and welfare office, a female employee there advised them to return to work and to accept the salary they had been offered, since the office could not seek compensation on their behalf. 

Today, the workers have yet to return to work, though they insist they would if their legal rights could be ensured.  The workers are asking that the employer improves the working and living conditions of their employment, in accordance with Thai law. 


The situation at Por Thai Sun (2) Co. Ltd

On 15 October 2004, 65 Burmese workers from the Por Thai Sun (2) factory approached the Labour Protection Office in Mae Sot with a list of complaints directed towards their employer. The complaints included: being paid 50-80 baht a day (USD1.20-USD2, compared to the minimum wage, as protected by labour laws, of USD3.00); being offered an even lower salary on 3 October 2004; being dismissed from work without due reason or notice on 10 October 2004; and, being forced to leave their work-place and accommodation on 15 October 2004.

The manager of the Por Thai Sun (2) factory, who happened to be at the Labour Protection Office when the workers arrived, offered to reinstate the workers.  However he suggested no system to ensure better pay, conditions and work security to his employees.  As a result, the workers refused to return to work.

Since factory workers in Mae Sot have no options but to live within their factory's compound, the temporary ID card that allows them to live in Thailand becomes invalid when the worker does not work.  Officially allowed to stay in Thailand independent of their employers, employers in Mae Sot are reluctant to break the chains that bind the workers to them.  Being dismissed from their work thus renders migrant workers homeless.  This group of workers has therefore had to seek shelter in a local temple.

On 18 October 2004, the workers returned to the Labour Protection Office hoping to get either a suitable agreement with the employer and return to work, or to start a legal process and be freed to find work and accommodation elsewhere.  The manager of the factory offered the workers 2,000 baht each, the equivalent of half a month's wages, irrespective of how long the workers had been employed.  In reality, some workers had worked at the factory for two months, while some had been there for two years.

The Labour Protection Officer, without an interpreter, tried to persuade the workers to accept this amount.  Realising that negotiations were far from unbiased, the workers requested to start a legal process and were duly handed the Labour Complaints forms to complete.  The forms however, are in Thai language only, and therefore remain incomplete, as many migrant workers are unable to read and write in Thai. 


Thai Labour Laws

According to Thai law, registered workers must receive the same protection as Thai workers. The minimum wage in Tak province is 133 baht per day (US $ 3), with 25 baht per hour for overtime work. However, the workers from the Kong Lian Thai factory and the Por Thai Sun (2) factory have been paid significantly less than this.   Hourly rates have varied between 50 to 80 baht, and even this has been threatened to be reduced under new plans at Kong Lian Thai.  Additionally, in the case of the Kong Lian Thai factory, workers have had to pay a monthly permit fee of 300 baht, which is difficult when their wages are so low.

Burmese migrant workers are routinely underpaid and abused in this region without any consequences for the employers. For example, in June 2003, 420 Burmese migrant workers from King Body Concept Co. Factory were fired and deported to Burma after demanding their legal rights. The immigration office immediately sent them back to Burma without any investigation of the dispute between the factory owner and the workers, which is a violation Thai law.  (See further: UA-23-2003) A further example occurred in September 2003, when 75 Burmese workers were forced to work under inhumane conditions, including shifts of 41 hours without being provided a break.  When the workers complained of such conditions, many of them were fired. (See further: UA-53-2003)

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please send a letter to the Minister for Labour requesting him to take steps to remedy this matter.   Please also send copies of that letter to those persons listed below.

1. Mrs. Uraiwan Tientong
Minister of Labor
Office of Ministry of Labor
Mitramaitree Road
Dindang
Bangkok 10400
THIALAND
Tel: +66 2 245 4310-4
Fax: +66 2 643 4457 or 232 1433 (for Vice Minister) or 232 1009 (for Secretary)
Website: www.mol.go.th

Copies to:

1. Mr.Pornchai Yooprayong and Mr.Suwat Sungtee
Deputy Director General
Department of Labour Protection and Welfare
Ministry of Labour
Khweng Din Daeng
Bangkok 10400
THAILAND
Fax: +66 2 245 3192
E-mail: pr_webmaster@labour.go.th

2. Mr. Pongthep Thepkanjana
Minister of Justice
Office of the Ministry of Justice
Ministry of Justice Building
22nd Floor
Chaeng Wattana Road
Pak Kred, Nonthaburi 11120
THAILAND
Tel: +66 2 502 8223
Fax: +66 2 502 8224

3. Professor Saneh Chamarik
Chairperson
The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand
422 Phya Thai Road
Pathurn Wan District
Bangkok 10300
THAILAND
Fax: +66 2 219 2940
E-mail: commission@nhrc.or.th

4. Mr. Dej-Udom Krairit
President
The Law Society of Thailand
7/89 Mansion 10, Rajdamnoenklang Avenue
Bovonnivet Sub-District, Phranakorn District
Bangkok 10200
THAILAND
Tel: +66 2 629 1430 (12 Lines)
Fax: +66 2 282 9907-8
E-mail: president@lawsociety.or.th

5. Ms. Christine Evans-Klock
Director
ILO Regional Office for East Asia (SRO-Bangkok)
United Nations Building, 10th Floor
Rajdamnern Nok Avenue, P.O. Box 2-349
Bangkok 10200
THAILAND
Tel: + 66 2 288 2219 / 288 2220
Fax: +66 2 288 3058
E-mail: bangkok@ilobkk.or.th

6. Mr. Abdul Sattar
UN Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery
OHCHR
Palais Wilson, Rue des Paquis 52
Geneva
SWITZERLAND
Fax: +41 22 917 9006

Suggested letter:

Dear Mrs. Uraiwan,

Re: Abuse of workers' rights by the Kong Lian Thai Knitting Co. Ltd. and the Por Thai Sun (2) Co. Ltd. in Mae Sot

I am deeply concerned by reports that Burmese legal workers, employed by Kong Lian Thai Knitting Co. Ltd. and the Por Thai Sun (2) Co. Ltd. in Mae Sot, are being denied their basic rights and are being exploited by being forced to work under inhumane conditions. Workers at both factories are being forced to work enormous hours on wages well below the minimum legal rate. More seriously, the workers have not had their complaints taken seriously by local Protection Officers, with both groups being advised to return to work, without safeguards in place to ensure their rights are met. 

They are also being denied the equal rights of Thai workers afforded to them through Thai labour laws.  Additionally, they are being denied the right to freedom of association, as stipulated by the International Labour Organisation, and therefore they are unable to access labour unions, which might provide them with the representation that they need and deserve.

I trust that you will to take action against the owners of the Kong Lian Thai Knitting Co. Ltd. and the Por Thai Sun (2) Co. Ltd. Factories, who have violated Thai law and abused the rights of migrant workers.

I urge the Thai government to provide equal treatment to all migrant workers, and to respect their rights and dignity according to current Thai law and international labour law.  In particular, the Ministry of Labour should create a special committee for the protection of migrant workers and establish an office in Mae Sot to achieve this. I further urge the Thai government to ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, which entered into force on July 1, 2003, and to also create a policy to protect migrant workers in full compliance with the Convention.  Finally, I ask that the Thai government ratify all ILO Conventions, and provide all of its workers the rights that both its own laws and international law must oblige them.  I trust that the ILO will take an interest in this matter, and ensure that migrant workers in Thailand have their rights met.

Yours faithfully,

******


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission
Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
UA-148-2003
Countries :
Issues :
Document Actions
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.