Home / News / Urgent Appeals / BURMA: Five men are charged without evidence for allegedly forming an illegal group

BURMA: Five men are charged without evidence for allegedly forming an illegal group

September 23, 2009

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-125-2009

24 September 2009
---------------------------------------------------------------------
BURMA: Five men are charged without evidence for allegedly forming an illegal group

ISSUES: Rule of law; military government; judicial system; freedom of association; illegal detention
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has obtained the details of yet another group of people in Burma who have been charged without evidence for alleged anti-government activities. Five young men have been accused of setting up an illegal group and trying to contact other groups based in Thailand. There is no actual evidence to support the charges, and other grave irregularities challenge the legitimacy of their arrest and detention.

CASE DETAILS:

Nyi Nyi Aung and four friends, all in their 20s, were arrested in January 2009 and held illegally for three months until a case was opened against them in court during April; they were then accused of having attempted to set up an illegal anti-government organisation. Nyi Nyi Aung has also been charged with a currency offence, because when he was arrested near Thailand he had Thai Baht in his possession, although this is neither surprising nor illegal for a person in a border town.

The police have no legitimate evidence to support the charges. Instead they have presented computer equipment and books on computing taken from the room of one accused, 22-year-old Ne Moe Aung. He is a computing student and the contents of his room taken by the police could be found in the room of any one of his classmates. Some poems taken from his room also reveal nothing. A map of refugee camps in Thailand was taken from another of the accused, but this map is actually from a government-published schoolbook. Again, if it is an offence to have it in one's possession, then every school-going child or her parents should also be charged.

Finally, the police case is riddled with inconsistencies. For instance, the searches of the accused were all officially conducted in January, when they were first detained, but the charge sheet falsely records the date of arrest as April 10.

The case against the five young men is ongoing. So far, four of the accused have been examined in court. One, Aung Hlaing Min, has been sick and unable to appear. Further details are provided in the sample letter below, as usual.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

The AHRC has been documenting numerous cases speaking to what it has described as Burma's 'injustice system' and provided a range of links on these in a recent urgent appeal on Aung Aung Oo and his fellow defendants: AHRC-UAC-107-2009. See also the recent appeals on the case of detained monk U Sandadhika (AHRC-UAC-110-2009) and Ma Mar Mar Aye (AHRC-UAU-024-2009). Two special reports have also been issued in the article 2 periodical, Saffron Revolution imprisoned, law denied (vol. 7, no. 3, September 2008) and Burma, political psychosis and legal dementia (vol. 6, no. 5-6, December 2007). There are also a number of related sites, including the AHRC Burmese-language blog, Pyithu Hittaing, and the 2008 AHRC Human Rights Report chapter on Burma.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write to the persons listed below to call for the case against the accused to be dropped. Please note that for the purposes of the letter Burma is referred to by its official name, Myanmar.

The AHRC is writing a separate letter to the UN Special Rapporteurs on Myanmar and the independence of judges and lawyers, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and the regional human rights office for Southeast Asia calling for interventions into this case.

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear ___________,

MYANMAR: Five men are charged without evidence for allegedly forming an illegal organisation

Details of accused:
1. Nyi Nyi Aung, 25; National ID No. 5/PaLaNa(Naing)056028; resident of Lepugan Village, Pale Township, Sagaing Division, Myanmar.
2. Aung Hlaing Min, 26; National ID No. 5/PaLaNa(Naing)104346.
3. Ne Moe Aung, 22; National ID No. 5/PaLaNa(Naing)050980.
4. Thant Zin Htun, 21; National ID No. 5/PaLaNa(Naing)064951.
5. Ne Lin Aung, 22; National ID No. 5/PaLaNa(Naing)068554; resident of Thammadaw Village, Hsalingyi Township, Sagaing Division.

Police officers involved:
1. Police Captain Myo Thant, Serial No. La/127901; Special Branch (SB) (prosecuting officer)
2. Deputy Inspector Win Aung, Serial No. La/128489; SB, Hlaing Township (junior investigating officer).
3. Inspector Myint Aung, Serial No. La/112649; Myawaddy Special Squad.
4. Deputy Inspector Khin Maung Win, Serial No. La/139226; SB, Yangon Division.
5. Inspector Htun Soe Thein, Serial No. La/139240; SB (senior investigating officer).
6. Deputy Inspector Maung Maung Myint, Serial No. La/112711; SB.

Charge & trial: Section 6, Organisation Law 1988, Hlaing Township Court, Yangon, Felony No. 356/2009; Judge Win Swe presiding; hearings began in May 2009. Defendant No. 1 also charged under section 24(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 (Hlaing Township Court, Felony No. 357/2009)

I am very sorry to hear that yet another evidence-less case has been lodged against some people in Myanmar because of their alleged anti-government activities, and I urge that the case be dropped.

According to the information I have been given, Nyi Nyi Aung and the other four accused along with other persons in January 2008 were charged with establishing an illegal organisation called Burma National Integrity to Democracy, with Nyi Nyi Aung and Aung Hlaing Min accused of arranging to travel to Thailand to meet with anti-government groups there. However there are a number of glaring violations of law in this case, including the following:

1. Illegal detention & false documentation: The accused were arrested on different days in January 2009 but the police did not bring the matter to court until 24 April during which time the defendants were kept in illegal custody at the Aungthapyay Interrogation Camp, where they are also suspected of having been tortured. The First Information Report did not give details of the exact day on which the inquiry commenced, and also falsely recorded the date of arrest of all accused as 10 April. However this is clearly contradicted by the search warrants, which for Nyi Nyi Aung and Aung Hlaing Min are dated 26 January, for Ne Moe Aung, 28 January, and for Ne Lin Aung, 29 January. The places of search and responsible police stations are also inconsistent.

2. Illegal search & seizure: The police searched Ne Moe Aung's room without a warrant, a fact that Deputy Inspector Win Aung admitted under cross-examination in court and that was confirmed by another prosecution witness. They confiscated and presented to court a variety of items, including a computer-programming book, three poems, and some computer equipment, but none of these items had anything to do with the alleged offence or had contents relevant to the charge; on the contrary, the computer materials were all related to his computing studies and can be found in the room of any student taking the same subject. The poems have only abstract romantic contents.

3. Absurd and non-existent 'evidence': Aside from the above items that were presented to the court as 'evidence', other items included a map of refugee camps in Thailand obtained from one of the defendants. In fact this map is from a middle school social studies government-issued textbook. On the other hand, the police had no firm evidence to link any of the accused to external anti-government groups, as they claimed, or even to prove the existence of such a group.

Furthermore, when Nyi Nyi Aung was arrested in Myawaddy town, adjacent to Thailand, he was found to have 1590 Thai Baht and was also charged with carrying foreign currency in Myanmar illegally. Yet Thai Baht is legal currency in the border town, where special regulations allow for daytime visitors from Thailand and it is openly exchanged and used. The documentation for this alleged offence is also inconsistent with that of the other offence: the date of the supposed police search of the defendant being recorded as being two days after the search for the first offence, and in a different place.

Accordingly, I urge that the Township Law Office concerned review the case at once and drop the charges against the accused, or that the responsible authorities otherwise take the necessary steps to see that the matter is laid to rest and the accused are allowed to go free.

Finally, I take this opportunity to remind the Government of Myanmar of the need to allow the International Committee of the Red Cross access to places of detention, in accordance with its globally recognized mandate, without any further delay.

Yours sincerely,

----------------

PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Maj-Gen. Maung Oo
Minister for Home Affairs
Ministry of Home Affairs
Office No. 10
Naypyitaw
MYANMAR
Tel: +95 67 412 079/ 549 393/ 549 663
Fax: +95 67 412 439

2. Lt-Gen. Thein Sein
Prime Minister
c/o Ministry of Defence
Naypyitaw
MYANMAR
Tel: + 95 1 372 681
Fax: + 95 1 652 624

3. U Aung Toe
Chief Justice
Office of the Supreme Court
Office No. 24
Naypyitaw
MYANMAR
Tel: + 95 67 404 080/ 071/ 078/ 067 or + 95 1 372 145
Fax: + 95 67 404 059

4. U Aye Maung
Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Office No. 25
Naypyitaw
MYANMAR
Tel: +95 67 404 088/ 090/ 092/ 094/ 097
Fax: +95 67 404 146/ 106

5. Brig-Gen. Khin Yi
Director General
Myanmar Police Force
Ministry of Home Affairs
Office No. 10
Naypyitaw
MYANMAR
Tel: +95 67 412 079/ 549 393/ 549 663
Fax: +951 549 663 / 549 208

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) (ua@ahrchk.org)
Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
AHRC-UAC-125-2009
Countries :
Document Actions
Share |
Subscribe to our Mailing List
Follow AHRC
Extended Introduction: Urgent Appeals, theory and practice

A need for dialogue

Many people across Asia are frustrated by the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.  Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality and military killings.  Many others are frustrated with the absence of rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like. 

Yet the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private sphere.  People complain among friends and family and within their social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a country because it is so hard to monitor. 

Though the media may cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private fears and anxieties of the average person.  And along with censorship – a common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in the public realm.

There may also be unwritten, possibly unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private grievances.  Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly.  In other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section of a society, which can control social expression of those less fortunate.  Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.

In this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates.  For any action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get these issues into the public sphere.

Changing society

In the past bridging this gap was a formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that required money and were therefore controlled by investors.  Printing presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone without money.  Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.

Still, thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with large audiences at little cost.  In this situation there is a real avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class or caste of the individual.

Practical action

The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.  If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.   

At the core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source and out to the international community via our program, which then builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the source through his or her own government.   However these cases in bulk create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program. As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:

"The urgent appeal introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery. The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the organisation will be doing all right."

Patterns start to emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks, national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies.  The program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the international media and for human rights education programs. All this helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to promote human rights in the region.