|
|
- Info
PAKISTAN: Two Balochis are abducted by plain-clothed agents with the help of police; no FIRs yet lodged
April 15, 2010
ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME
Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-046-2010
16 April 2010 ------------------------------------------------------ PAKISTAN: Two Balochis are abducted by plain-clothed agents with the help of police; no FIRs yet lodged
ISSUES: Disappearances; illegal arrest and detention ------------------------------------------------------
Dear friends,
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information regarding the illegal arrest, abduction and disappearance of two persons from the Baloch Nationalist Movement on two separate occasions in April. Eyewitnesses in both cases saw the arrests carried out illegally by persons in and out of uniform, and the family of neither man have been contacted by the authorities responsible. The local police stations have refused to file First Information Reports in both cases.
Military and security agents remain largely unchallenged by the government on their high rate of illegal arrests and abductions often with the help of uniformed police. This is despite a Supreme Court order in February for police cooperation on the issue.
CASE DETAILS: (Based on reports received from the victims' families and media sources)
Mr. Mahboob Ali Wadela (pictured left) is a senior member of the Baloch National Movement (BNM), which is part of the Baloch National Front (BNF), a nationalist movement struggling for greater autonomy of the province. He had been traveling in a passenger vehicle in Karachi bound for Gwader, a port city in Balochistan on 2 April for just a few minutes when it was stopped by uniformed police from Maripur station in Yousuf Goth.
According to passengers on the bus two vans resembling army vehicles arrived at the scene almost immediately and plain-clothed persons emerged and began to check the identity cards of the passengers. When they came upon Mahboob they reportedly pulled him from the bus with his luggage and drove him away in one of the unmarked vehicles. The passenger vehicle was then prevented from leaving the area by police for some time.
When Mahboob was identified, according to the driver and passengers, one of the plain-clothed persons had announced 'thats the one were looking for'. The eyewitness account of the passengers, from Vsh News on 4 April, can be seen here with English subtitles:
To support this appeal please click here:  ------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear __________,
PAKISTAN: Two Balochis are abducted by plain-clothed agents with the help of police; no FIRs yet lodged
Name of victims: 1. Mr. Mahboob Ali Wadela, son of Baig Muhammad; resident of R- 9/10, Gulshane Munir, Malir district, Karachi, Sindh province. 2. Mir Bohair Bangulzai Son of Mir Abdul Nabi Bangulzai; resident of Askari Park, Quetta, Balochistan province Alleged perpetrators: State intelligence and police officials
Date of incident: April 1 and April 2 Place of incident: Karachi, Sindh province and Quetta, Balochistan
I am deeply concerned to hear that two persons from the Baloch Nationalist Front on two separate occasions were illegally arrested, abducted and disappeared at the beginning of this month on two separate occasions. This is despite the government's pledge to meaningfully address the illegal abductions being committed weekly by state agents in the country, and the creation of a commission on disappearances to investigate the issue.
According to the information I have received, Mr. Mahboob Ali Wadela is a senior member of the Baloch National Movement (BNM), a nationalist movement struggling for greater autonomy of the province. He had been traveling in a passenger vehicle in Karachi bound for Gwader, a port city in Balochistan on 2 April for about five minutes when it was stopped by uniformed police from Maripur station, in Yousuf Goth.
According to passengers on the bus, two vans resembling army vehicles arrived at the scene almost immediately, and plain clothed persons emerged and began to check the identity cards of the passengers. When they came upon Mahboob they reportedly pulled him from the bus with his luggage and drove him away in one of the unmarked vehicles. The passenger vehicle was then prevented from leaving the area by police for some time.
The family does not know why he was arrested and has not been contacted with information on his whereabouts. They fear for his security in illegal custody and are concerned that the medicine that he needs may not be made available. Although the victim's brother tried to lodge an FIR at Marripur police station, which is in the area of the abduction, I am told that police refused to do so. After his insistence they filed a written complaint in the Roznamcha or daily police diary. No FIR has yet been registered.
Mahboob's mother, Mrs Shamim, has written appeals to the Sindh High Court, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the prime minister, the provincial minister of the interior in Sindh and various other authorities to ask for information and assistance in locating her son. She has received no response.
Mir Bohair Bangulzai, another BNF member, was abducted from his car on Thursday 1 April 2010 from Askari Park in Quetta, Balochistan. According to eyewitnesses he was driving home when he was stopped by uniformed police officers. Persons then emerged from a double cabin Toyota Hi-Lux jeep and despite the efforts of passersby to obstruct them, abducted the victim and drove away. The vehicle was driven by a person in plain clothes who identified himself as Frontier Corp (FC) personnel at the time.
Though man's relatives have contacted the local authorities, Quetta police have illogically and illegally cited false police procedure: they have told relatives that they will investigate the incident before they file an FIR.
A Baloch National Front spokesman has announced the group's suspicions that the abductions were perpetrated by intelligence agents and linked to a proposed memorial meeting of the Shuhada-e-Murghab (Martyrs of Murghab) a Baloch nationalist group on 3 April in Gwader, Balochistan.
Though I am heartened to note that the government of Pakistan recently announced the formation of a three-member commission on disappearances, I would like to know what mandate and what powers it will have. The commission faces extreme institutional indifference and must be given full administrative support if it is to fulfill any of its responsibilities meaningfully.
I ask that you intervene immediately to ensure an immediate investigation into the abduction of these two men, and into the involvement of state agents and police in their disappearance. The men must be located and safely released, and those proven to be responsible must face legal sanctions.
Yours sincerely,
----------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
Prime Minister Prime Minister House Islamabad PAKISTAN Fax: +92 51 922 1596 Tel: +92 51 920 6111 E-mail: secretary@cabinet.gov.pk
2. Mr.Syed Mumtaz Alam Gillani Federal Minister for Human Rights Ministry of Human Rights Old US Aid building Ata Turk Avenue G-5, Islamabad PAKISTAN Fax: +9251-9204108 Email: sarfraz_yousuf@yahoo.com
3. Dr. Faqir Hussain Registrar Supreme Court of Pakistan Constitution Avenue, Islamabad PAKISTAN Fax: + 92 51 9213452 E-mail: mail@supremecourt.gov.pk
4. Minister of Law Government of Punjab Punjab Secretariat Ravi Road Lahore PAKISTAN Fax: +92-42-99212004 E-mail: law@punjab.gov.pk
5. Nawab Aslam Raisani Chief Minister of Balochistan Chief Minister House, Quette, PAKISTAN Fax: +92 81 920 2240 Tel: +92 81 449582 / 440661 E-mail: mirlashkari@yahoo.com
6. Nawab Zulfiqar Magsi Governor of Balochistan Governor House Balochistan, Quetta- Balochistan province, PAKISTAN Fax: +92 81 920 2992
7. Chief Secretary Government of Balochistan Quetta, Balochistan province PAKISTAN Fax: +92 81 9202132 Thank you.
Urgent Appeals Programme Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Document Type :
Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID :
AHRC-UAC-046-2010
|
-
A need for
dialogue
Many people across Asia are frustrated by
the widespread lack of respect for human rights in their countries.
Some may be unhappy about the limitations on the freedom of expression
or restrictions on privacy, while some are affected by police brutality
and military killings. Many others are frustrated with the absence of
rights on labour issues, the environment, gender and the like.
Yet
the expression of this frustration tends to stay firmly in the private
sphere. People complain among friends and family and within their
social circles, but often on a low profile basis. This kind of public
discourse is not usually an effective measure of the situation in a
country because it is so hard to monitor.
Though the media may
cover the issues in a broad manner they rarely broadcast the private
fears and anxieties of the average person. And along with censorship – a
common blight in Asia – there is also often a conscious attempt in the
media to reflect a positive or at least sober mood at home, where
expressions of domestic malcontent are discouraged as unfashionably
unpatriotic. Talking about issues like torture is rarely encouraged in
the public realm.
There may also be unwritten, possibly
unconscious social taboos that stop the public reflection of private
grievances. Where authoritarian control is tight, sophisticated
strategies are put into play by equally sophisticated media practices to
keep complaints out of the public space, sometimes very subtly. In
other places an inner consensus is influenced by the privileged section
of a society, which can control social expression of those less
fortunate. Moral and ethical qualms can also be an obstacle.
In
this way, causes for complaint go unaddressed, un-discussed and
unresolved and oppression in its many forms, self perpetuates. For any
action to arise out of private frustration, people need ways to get
these issues into the public sphere.
Changing
society
In the past bridging this gap was a
formidable task; it relied on channels of public expression that
required money and were therefore controlled by investors. Printing
presses were expensive, which blocked the gate to expression to anyone
without money. Except in times of revolution the media in Asia has
tended to serve the well-off and sideline or misrepresent the poor.
Still,
thanks to the IT revolution it is now possible to communicate with
large audiences at little cost. In this situation there is a real
avenue for taking issues from private to public, regardless of the class
or caste of the individual.
Practical
action
The AHRC Urgent Appeals system was created
to give a voice to those affected by human rights violations, and by
doing so, to create a network of support and open avenues for action.
If X’s freedom of expression is denied, if Y is tortured by someone in
power or if Z finds his or her labour rights abused, the incident can be
swiftly and effectively broadcast and dealt with. The resulting
solidarity can lead to action, resolution and change. And as more people
understand their rights and follow suit, as the human rights
consciousness grows, change happens faster. The Internet has become one
of the human rights community’s most powerful tools.
At the
core of the Urgent Appeals Program is the recording of human rights
violations at a grass roots level with objectivity, sympathy and
competence. Our information is firstly gathered on the ground, close to
the victim of the violation, and is then broadcast by a team of
advocates, who can apply decades of experience in the field and a
working knowledge of the international human rights arena. The flow of
information – due to domestic restrictions – often goes from the source
and out to the international community via our program, which then
builds a pressure for action that steadily makes its way back to the
source through his or her own government. However these cases in bulk
create a narrative – and this is most important aspect of our program.
As noted by Sri Lankan human rights lawyer and director of the Asian
Human Rights Commission, Basil Fernando:
"The urgent appeal
introduces narrative as the driving force for social change. This idea
was well expressed in the film Amistad, regarding the issue of slavery.
The old man in the film, former president and lawyer, states that to
resolve this historical problem it is very essential to know the
narrative of the people. It was on this basis that a court case is
conducted later. The AHRC establishes the narrative of human rights
violations through the urgent appeals. If the narrative is right, the
organisation will be doing all right."
Patterns start to
emerge as violations are documented across the continent, allowing us to
take a more authoritative, systemic response, and to pinpoint the
systems within each country that are breaking down. This way we are able
to discover and explain why and how violations take place, and how they
can most effectively be addressed. On this path, larger audiences have
opened up to us and become involved: international NGOs and think tanks,
national human rights commissions and United Nations bodies. The
program and its coordinators have become a well-used tool for the
international media and for human rights education programs. All this
helps pave the way for radical reforms to improve, protect and to
promote human rights in the region.
|